Betting Software Review - Sport Software Review

An insider’s guide for Betting Software phenomenon
Website editorialist: Frank Uhlman

 

 

We strongly recommend using betting software

but you must be very well informed before choosing one.
Once you’ve made the right choice it will really help you in making profitable bets!

 Keep in mind the followings:


Why you need.
Bookmakers’ profits are based in an important measure on the lack of information that punters have.
By using betting software you will not be anymore in a disadvantageous position in relation to bookmakers. You’ll get essential information that, be sure, bookmakers have.
What you need. The good one.
A good software program is a simple one.
A good software program is an easy-to-use one.
A good software program is the one you understand it.
A good software program is a trustful partner when placing a bet.
The science.
Be sure that a good theory will never be revealed but kept secret. When scientific explanations are abundant something is not very ok with that software.
 

 

 

 

Online Betting Software Review

 

Send your reviews or votes at:

BetSoftwareReview@isuisse.com

 

In order to keep independent, only one vote and one review monthly from the same e-mail are allowed.

Betting Software reviews:

 

GoWin!The Betting Forecaster

The only professional and still for everybody's understanding betting tool until now. Simply interface, really good predictions, ergonomic design, vital statistics in a convenient form. Catchy Biorhythm&Face-to-Face presentation. Update service: over 70 leagues! However, who needs so many leagues? click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Leagueanalyzer

Expensive software, high-complexity, not for private use. No predictions. Complex statistics. Professional but not very suitable for punters. click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Leaguepad

Detailed statistics, but poor organization. You may lose among them. Unrealistic forecast probabilities. Not very suitable for punters. No update for leagues (only from volunteers). Anyway, a fair offer. click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Neurodesigner

Modern graphics but predictions you can not rely on. Hard to work with it, analysis only for a single match. Not realistic schema based on betting on a single match. Expensive since the license is offered only for a limited time. No practical value, it seems to be more a scientific work. click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Betassistant

It predicts pretty well only the already played matches (for which it has the results)!!! Bookmakers odds for last years matches – who needs them? click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Bettinggenius

Good details. Bad interface: although is not a very sophisticated software it looks like a complicated one. Many aspects treated. Poor score prediction: only 2-1 and 1-1. ‘Free results updating’ must be read as ‘not guaranteed updating’. Beware of their unreal 80% claimed accuracy. Marketing strategy or cheating? click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Footballsymphony

Bad choice these green windows. Good details for players. They try to make a good impression claiming some mathematics theory for inexperienced users. No Demo – this is doubtful. The symphony is rather jarring. click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Intellitipster

Nice name, hope the author passed the exam with this 1st year student project. Really? I’d prefer not to talk about its so-called ‘predictions’. Many leagues, but the update is made separately. Poor interface. Pay for nothing. click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Coto

Old software.  Unfortunately everybody knows software is not like wine.  It seems more like a children toy. You better try FIFA 2000! You'll get more fun! They didn't understand that betting is a business for  adult people. Auf Wiedersehen! click here to see users’ reviews

 
 

Footyforecast

A complicated site designed especially as a trap for naive punters. I advise you to take a look at their bookmakers' advertisement. They win money if your bets are missed. Conflicting interests. You should avoid this kind of help. click here to see users’ reviews

 

Oddswizard

How many specialists to make such a little software! I'm wondering what language are speaking because it seems that they didn't understand very well. Be cautious and do not believe all they say. click here to see users’ reviews

 

Xbetworld

Expensive software for only 3 months of chatting. As I know chat is free on the internet. There are also other services normally free, for which you have to pay a lot. Ignoring these services, costly with XBet, remains almost nothing in a complicated style! It requires also a permanent online internet connection in order to work properly.  click here to see users’ reviews

 

Totomaster

It predicts pretty well only the already played matches (for which it has the results)!!! Based only on scored goals and on a magic coefficient (?!). Let’s be serious: we are in the 21st century. Free program, cheap predictions. I didn’t understand which is the interest of the author. click here to see users’ reviews

The boss

Who’s the boss? You can see his face only after buying. Why is he hiding? Don't be fooled by the boss' self praise. Think twice before paying for this software. Excuse me, I've made a mistake. Think three times. I’d rather name it the Boss WYM. That is the boss wants your money. click here to see users’ reviews

Only the first three places have hyperlinks. Hope this is useful for you.

Bet Software Review, Critical view by Frank Uhlman ©2007 Switzerland